Quark is STILL light years superior to InDesign and I use both daily, so it's not some old fogey opinion due to not being able to adapt to new things. Why on earth were you happy to see Quark Die? I'm that tells me that you started in this industry only after InDecrap was released because not a single person in the hundreds of agencies and service bureaus disliked Quark in any capacity.
If it engaged even 20% of the machine's capabilities, we would never see the loading bar, much less the beach ball and all these threads and threads of speed and performance complaints across a myriad or support sites would all dry up. It is absolutely infuriating watching it chug along and only access a fragment of the computer's power. indb file and hit synchronize, I get a beach ball, as it figures out a progress bar, then the progress bar creeps across as it chugs along. Guess what? When I open my 264-page catalog. I installed 3 pieces of software:ġ: Current 2020 Creative cloud to install InDesign Heinous.ĭear Adobe - I just upgraded to a 28 core Mac Pro with 192 GB of ram running a factory install of Mac OS Catalina. Rather than address the problem in a new version release, they hide the lag in these forums telling people to trash their preferences or reinstall the software. What am I getting at? InDesign does not support modern multicore processors. As you watch the beachball spin and the load bar barely creep - you'll notice that the CPU load is negligible (for me its 2%) and that of all the CPU processor cores on your machine, only one at a time engage. What do I mean? Download any CPU monitor (mac or PC) and start whatever process is taking up all the hours in your life.
All these "solutions" are nonsense trying to hide the fact the InDesign is just badly written software that Adobe for whatever reason keeps kicking down the road and not fixing. Ok - This is an older thread but the issue persists in 2020.
0 kommentar(er)
